|
Home
Store
CHAPTER XXIV.
THE TRINITY VERY ANCIENTLY A CURRENT HEATHEN DOCTRINE
"THERE are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and
the Holy Ghost, and these three are one." (1 John v. 7.) This text,
which evidently discloses a belief in the existence of three separate
and distinct beings in the Godhead, sets forth a doctrine which was
anciently of almost universal prevalence. Nearly every nation, whether
oriental or occidental, whose religious faith has been commemorated in
history, discloses in its creed a belief in the trifold nature and
triune division of the Deity. St. Jerome testifies unequivocally, "All
the ancient nations believed in the Trinity.
And a volume of facts and figures might be cited here, if we had space
for them, in proof of this statement.
A text from one of the Hindoo bibles, (the Puranas) will evince the
antiquity and prevalence of this belief in a nation of one hundred and
fifty millions of people more than two thousand years ago. "O you three
Lords!" ejaculated Attencion, "know that I recognize only one God.
Inform me, therefore, which of you is the true divinity that I may
address to him alone my vows and adorations. The three Gods, Brahma,
Vishnu, and Siva, becoming manifest to him, replied, "Learn, O devotee,
that there is no real distinction between us. What to you appears such
is only by semblance. The single being appears under three forms by the
acts of creation, preservation and destruction, but he is one."
p. 185
Now, reader, note the remark here, that the ancient Christian fathers
almost universally and unanimously proclaimed the doctrine of the
Trinity as one of the leading tenets of the Christian faith, and as a
doctrine derived directly by revelation from heaven. But here we find it
most explicitly set forth by a disciple of a pagan religion more than
three thousand years ago, as the Christian missionary D. O. Allen
states, that the Hindoo bible, in which it was found was compiled
fourteen hundred years before Christ, and written at a still earlier
period. And we find the same doctrine very explicitly taught in the
ancient Brahmin, Persian, Chaldean, Chinese, Mexican and Grecian
systems—all much older than Christianity.
No writer ever taught or avowed a belief in any tenet of religious faith
more fully or plainly than Plato sets forth the doctrine of the Trinity
in his Phædon, written four hundred years B.C. And his terms are found
to be in most striking conformity to the Christian doctrine on this
subject, as taught in the New Testament. Plato's first term for the
Trinity was in Greek—1. To Agathon, the supreme God or Father. 2. The
Logos, which is the Greek term for the Word. And, 3. Psyche, which the
Greek Lexicon defines to mean "soul, spirit or ghost"—of course, the
Holy Ghost. Here we have the three terms of the Christian Trinity,
Father, Word, and Holy Ghost, as plainly taught as language can express
it, thus making Plato's exposition of the Trinity and definition of its
terms, published four hundred years B.C., identical in meaning with
those of St. John's, as found in his Gospel, and contained in the above
quoted text. Where, then, is the foundation for the dogmatic claim on
the part of the Christian professors for the divine origin of the
Trinity doctrine?
We will here cite the testimony of some Christian writers to prove that
the Trinity is a pagan-derived doctrine. A Christian bishop, Mr. Powell,
declares, "I not only confess
p. 186
but I maintain, such a similitude of Plato's and John's Trinity
doctrines as bespeaks a common origin." (Thirteenth letter to Dr.
Priestley.) What is that you say, bishop? "A common origin." Then you
concede both are heaven-derived, or both heathen-derived. If the former,
then revelation and heathenism are synonymous terms. If the latter, then
Christianity stands on a level with heathen mythology. Which horn of the
dilemma will you choose? St. Augustine confessed he found the beginning
of John's Gospel in Plato's Phædon, which is a concession of the whole
ground.
Another writer, Chataubron, speaks of an ancient Greek inscription on
the great obelisk at Rome, which reads—"1. The Mighty God." 2. The
Begotten of God (as Christ is declared to be "the only begotten of the
Father" (John i. 14.). And, 3. "Apollo the Spirit"—the Holy Spirit or
Holy Ghost—thus presenting in plain language the three terms of the
Trinity. And Mr. Cudworth, in corroboration of this report, says, "The
Greeks had a first God, and second God, and third God, and the second
was begotten by the first. And yet for all that," continues Mr. Cudworth,
"they considered all these one."
In the Platonic or Grecian Trinity, the first person was considered the
planner of the work of creation, the second person the creator, and the
third person the ghost or spirit which moved upon the face of the
waters, and infused life into the mighty deep at creation—the same Holy
Ghost which descended from heaven to infuse life into the waters at
Christ's baptism; thus, the resemblance is complete. Mr. Basnage quotes
a Christian writer of the fifth century as declaring, "The Athenian sage
Plato marvelously anticipated one of the most important and mysterious
doctrines of the Christian religion"—meaning the Trinity—an important
concession truly.
The oldest and probably the original form of the Trinity
p. 187
is that found in the Brahmin and Hindoo systems—the terms of which
are—1. Brahma, the Father or supreme God. 2. Vishnu, the incarnate Word
and Creator. 3. Siva, the Spirit of God, i.e., the Holy Spirit or
Ghost—each answering to corresponding terms of the Christian Trinity,
and yet two thousand years older, according to Dr. Smith.
We have not allowable space for other facts and citations (as this work
is designed as a mere epitome), although we have but entered upon the
threshold of the evidence tending to prove that the Christian Trinity
was born of heathen parents, that it is an offspring of heathen
mythology, like other doctrines of the Christian faith, claimed by its
disciples as the gift of divine revelation.
Here let it be noted as a curious chapter in sacred history that the
numerous divine Trinities which have constituted a part of nearly every
religious system ever propagated to the world were composed, in every
case, of male Gods. No female has ever yet been admitted into the triad
of Gods composing the orthodox Trinity. Every member of the Trinity in
every case is a male, and an old bachelor—a doctrine most flagrantly at
war with the principles of modern philosophy.
For this science teaches us that the endowment of a being with either
male or female organs, presupposes the existence of the other sex; and
that either sex, without the other would be a ludicrous anomaly, and a
ludicrous distortion of nature unparalleled in the history of science.
As sexual organs create an imperious desire for the other sex, no male
or female could long enjoy full happiness in the absence of the other
party. What an unhappy, lonesome place, therefore, the orthodox heaven
must have been, during the eternity of the past, with no society but old
bachelors! The Trinity was constituted of males simply because woman has
always been considered a mere
p. 188
cipher in society—a mere tool for man's convenience, an appendage to his
wants. Hence, instead of having a place among the Gods she led the
practical life of a servant and a menial, which accounts for her
exclusion from the Trinity. But the time is coming when she will rule
both heaven and earth with the omnipotent power of her love nature. Then
we shall have no "war in heaven," and no fighting on earth.
from Crucified Saviors
|